Hi, I'm brand new when it comes to BLAS and LAPACK and could use some help.

BLAS/LAPACK 3.5.0 Install on Mac OS X 10.6.8 by dvc2509 » Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:28 am Hi, I'm brand new when it comes to BLAS and LAPACK and could use some help.

May 18, 2019  Replaces all vanilla combat and assault rifles with Deadpool2099's Service Rifle This mod edits several entries to Mysterious Weapon Replacers - Service Rifle Redux by cydonianmystery. This mod is fully standalone and has all the entries from the original mod. Fallout 4 combat rifle replacer Apr 03, 2019  I'm just so desperate to get a replacer for my combat rifle at this point. Edit: Nvm, just had to upgrade the combat rifle's parts one by one and they all showed their new parts from this mod. By any chance do you think you could use this Kriss SMG to replace the combat rifle. This is my dream weapon replacer. If you can do this, I'll give you $10. Apr 03, 2019  This mod simply replaces the vanilla Combat Rifle with T41NT3D & C1ph3rr's R91 - Fallout 3 Assault Rifle. The main file is the weapon replacer, the two optional files are for a black polymer retexture of the stock and hand guard and the other is a sound fix for those who have the issue of a silent rifle.

  • Mac OS X¶ On Mac OS X, we recommend our users install GCC 8 via Homebrew instead of relying on XCode command line tools installation and the default Apple Clang compilers. Too often we see our users on Mac with issues regarding missing standard includes like wchar.h and others. This is ultimately due to an improper install of XCode (see here.
  • If you need to install a separate LAPACK, it's now available as a Homebrew formula in Homebrew core. So brew install lapack will work now. The Homebrew lapack formula currently includes a pre-built binary 'bottle' for OS X 10.11, so the installation should be easy and fast.
  • Installing numpy on Mac OS X Mavericks with alternate LAPACK/BLAS. Ask Question Asked 6 years, 4 months ago. So I'm trying to link an alternate LAPACK/BLAS when installing NumPy, in the hopes that my code can then be parallelized without crashes! I downloaded and compiled an alternative LAPACK/BLAS. Then, following instructions here, I did.
  • Jun 30, 2017 If the BLAS and LAPACK shared and/or static libraries are installed, there should be no further problems following the installation instructions below. Mac OS X A binary can be built for Mac using Apple's optimized versions of the BLAS and LAPACK libraries, which are contained in the 'vecLib' sub-framework, part of the 'Accelerate' framework.

Installing Lapack On Mac Os X 10


Ultimately I'm trying to install both so that I can use the LA packages (as a library) with Fortran 77 code compiled with gfortran. I'm using Maz OS X 10.6.8 and am attempting to install lapack version 3.5.0
Initially I followed the instructions given here: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GfortranBuild for BLAS and LAPACK installation, but on getting some errors switched to the instructions given here: http://pheiter.wordpress.com/2012/09/04 .. on-mac-os/ and followed them exactly. To save you clicking on the link:
Both packages are required when you deal with linear algebra operations, e.g. solving linear equation systems. Originally, both packages were written in FORTRAN, but I want to use them coding in C++. The solution is to create a libraray! There’re a few steps to consider while installing the packages. First, you have to install BLAS, because LAPACK requires it. If you have downloaded both packages, unzip them. Switch to the BLAS folder and execute
$ make
to compile all fortran files. After that, execute
$ mv blas_UNIX.a libblas.a
to rename the created library. Now, you created a library called “libblas.a”. You just copy that file to your library folder. Therefore execute the following command
sudo cp libblas.a /usr/local/lib/
Et voila. You’ve installed the BLAS package. Now switch to the LAPACK folder and adjust the file “make.inc”. If you set all parameter correctly, execute the command
$ make

My BLAS directory is Users/username/BLAS, LAPACK is users/username/lapack-3.5.0
In my make.inc file
Code: Select all
BLASLIB = libblas.a

Lapack For Windows

Everything else is as it was when I d/l'ed it.
Having done all that the errors in the testing that caused me to switch to the other installation instructions when I run make are still there, and I've been unable to find useful references to them on the web:
( cd INSTALL; make; ./testlsame; ./testslamch; ./testdlamch;
./testsecond; ./testdsecnd; ./testieee; ./testversion )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
ASCII character set
Tests completed
Epsilon = 5.96046448E-08
Safe minimum = 1.17549435E-38
Base = 2.0000000
Precision = 1.19209290E-07
Number of digits in mantissa = 24.000000
Rounding mode = 1.0000000
Minimum exponent = -125.00000
Underflow threshold = 1.17549435E-38
Largest exponent = 128.00000
Overflow threshold = 3.40282347E+38
Reciprocal of safe minimum = 8.50705917E+37
Epsilon = 1.11022302462515654E-016
Safe minimum = 2.22507385850720138E-308
Base = 2.0000000000000000
Precision = 2.22044604925031308E-016
Number of digits in mantissa = 53.000000000000000
Rounding mode = 1.0000000000000000
Minimum exponent = -1021.0000000000000
Underflow threshold = 2.22507385850720138E-308
Largest exponent = 1024.0000000000000
Overflow threshold = 1.79769313486231571E+308
Reciprocal of safe minimum = 4.49423283715578977E+307
Time for 0.100E+09 SAXPY ops = 0.394E-01 seconds
SAXPY performance rate = 0.254E+04 mflops
Including SECOND, time = 0.628E-01 seconds
Average time for SECOND = 0.467E-03 milliseconds
Equivalent floating point ops = 0.118E+04 ops
Time for 0.100E+09 DAXPY ops = 0.401E-01 seconds
DAXPY performance rate = 0.250E+04 mflops
Including DSECND, time = 0.640E-01 seconds
Average time for DSECND = 0.479E-03 milliseconds
Equivalent floating point ops = 0.120E+04 ops
We are about to check whether infinity arithmetic
can be trusted. If this test hangs, set
ILAENV = 0 for ISPEC = 10 in LAPACK/SRC/ilaenv.f
Infinity arithmetic performed as per the ieee spec.
However, this is not an exhaustive test and does not
guarantee that infinity arithmetic meets the ieee spec.
We are about to check whether NaN arithmetic
can be trusted. If this test hangs, set
ILAENV = 0 for ISPEC = 11 in LAPACK/SRC/ilaenv.f
NaN arithmetic performed as per the ieee spec.
However, this is not an exhaustive test and does not
guarantee that NaN arithmetic meets the ieee spec.
LAPACK 3 . 5 . 0
( cd SRC; make )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd TESTING/MATGEN; make )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS/TESTING; make -f Makeblat1 )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS; ./xblat1s > sblat1.out ;
./xblat1d > dblat1.out ;
./xblat1c > cblat1.out ;
./xblat1z > zblat1.out )
/bin/sh: line 1: 7051 Segmentation fault ./xblat1c > cblat1.out
( cd BLAS/TESTING; make -f Makeblat2 )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS; ./xblat2s < sblat2.in ;
./xblat2d < dblat2.in ;
./xblat2c < cblat2.in ;
./xblat2z < zblat2.in )
Parameter 1 to routine SGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in SGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine DGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in DGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine CGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in CGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine ZGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in ZGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0


So, I'm at a loss and could do with some direction. I'm not even sure if this is at all important to be honest, so any insight would be welcome.
Thanks in advance,
DanielHi, I'm brand new when it comes to BLAS and LAPACK and could use some help.
Ultimately I'm trying to install both so that I can use the LA packages (as a library) with Fortran 77 code compiled with gfortran. I'm using Maz OS X 10.6.8 and am attempting to install lapack version 3.5.0
Initially I followed the instructions given here: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GfortranBuild for BLAS and LAPACK installation, but on getting some errors switched to the instructions given here: http://pheiter.wordpress.com/2012/09/04 .. on-mac-os/ and followed them exactly. To save you clicking on the link:
Both packages are required when you deal with linear algebra operations, e.g. solving linear equation systems. Originally, both packages were written in FORTRAN, but I want to use them coding in C++. The solution is to create a libraray! There’re a few steps to consider while installing the packages. First, you have to install BLAS, because LAPACK requires it. If you have downloaded both packages, unzip them. Switch to the BLAS folder and execute
$ make
to compile all fortran files. After that, execute
$ mv blas_UNIX.a libblas.a
to rename the created library. Now, you created a library called “libblas.a”. You just copy that file to your library folder. Therefore execute the following command
sudo cp libblas.a /usr/local/lib/
Et voila. You’ve installed the BLAS package. Now switch to the LAPACK folder and adjust the file “make.inc”. If you set all parameter correctly, execute the command
$ make

Mac Os X 10.11 Download Free

My BLAS directory is Users/username/BLAS, LAPACK is users/username/lapack-3.5.0
In my make.inc file
Code: Select all
BLASLIB = libblas.a
Everything else is as it was when I d/l'ed it.
Having done all that the errors in the testing that caused me to switch to the other installation instructions when I run make are still there, and I've been unable to find useful references to them on the web:

Installing Lapack On Mac Os X 10 12 Download

( cd INSTALL; make; ./testlsame; ./testslamch; ./testdlamch;
./testsecond; ./testdsecnd; ./testieee; ./testversion )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
ASCII character set
Tests completed
Epsilon = 5.96046448E-08
Safe minimum = 1.17549435E-38
Base = 2.0000000
Precision = 1.19209290E-07
Number of digits in mantissa = 24.000000
Rounding mode = 1.0000000
Minimum exponent = -125.00000
Underflow threshold = 1.17549435E-38
Largest exponent = 128.00000
Overflow threshold = 3.40282347E+38
Reciprocal of safe minimum = 8.50705917E+37
Epsilon = 1.11022302462515654E-016
Safe minimum = 2.22507385850720138E-308
Base = 2.0000000000000000
Precision = 2.22044604925031308E-016
Number of digits in mantissa = 53.000000000000000
Rounding mode = 1.0000000000000000
Minimum exponent = -1021.0000000000000
Underflow threshold = 2.22507385850720138E-308
Largest exponent = 1024.0000000000000
Overflow threshold = 1.79769313486231571E+308
Reciprocal of safe minimum = 4.49423283715578977E+307
Time for 0.100E+09 SAXPY ops = 0.394E-01 seconds
SAXPY performance rate = 0.254E+04 mflops
Including SECOND, time = 0.628E-01 seconds
Average time for SECOND = 0.467E-03 milliseconds
Equivalent floating point ops = 0.118E+04 ops
Time for 0.100E+09 DAXPY ops = 0.401E-01 seconds
DAXPY performance rate = 0.250E+04 mflops
Including DSECND, time = 0.640E-01 seconds
Average time for DSECND = 0.479E-03 milliseconds
Equivalent floating point ops = 0.120E+04 ops
We are about to check whether infinity arithmetic
can be trusted. If this test hangs, set
ILAENV = 0 for ISPEC = 10 in LAPACK/SRC/ilaenv.f
Infinity arithmetic performed as per the ieee spec.
However, this is not an exhaustive test and does not
guarantee that infinity arithmetic meets the ieee spec.
We are about to check whether NaN arithmetic
can be trusted. If this test hangs, set
ILAENV = 0 for ISPEC = 11 in LAPACK/SRC/ilaenv.f
NaN arithmetic performed as per the ieee spec.
However, this is not an exhaustive test and does not
guarantee that NaN arithmetic meets the ieee spec.
LAPACK 3 . 5 . 0
( cd SRC; make )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd TESTING/MATGEN; make )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS/TESTING; make -f Makeblat1 )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS; ./xblat1s > sblat1.out ;
./xblat1d > dblat1.out ;
./xblat1c > cblat1.out ;
./xblat1z > zblat1.out )
/bin/sh: line 1: 7051 Segmentation fault ./xblat1c > cblat1.out
( cd BLAS/TESTING; make -f Makeblat2 )
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
( cd BLAS; ./xblat2s < sblat2.in ;
./xblat2d < dblat2.in ;
./xblat2c < cblat2.in ;
./xblat2z < zblat2.in )
Parameter 1 to routine SGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in SGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine DGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in DGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine CGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in CGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0
Parameter 1 to routine ZGEMV was incorrect
Mac OS BLAS parameter error in ZGEMV , parameter #0, (unavailable), is 0


So, I'm at a loss and could do with some direction. I'm not even sure if this is at all important to be honest, so any insight would be welcome.
Thanks in advance,Mac

Lapack Install Ubuntu


Install Blas Lapack Ubuntu

Daniel